CHAPTER 2
__________________________
Program Requirements
In order to
receive the Ph.D. in Clinical Psychology a student must complete six
requirements: (1) course requirements;
(2) ethical and professional training; (3) two preliminary projects; (4)
practical competence in clinical skills; (5) an approved clinical internship;
and (6) a doctoral dissertation and defense of the dissertation. Each of these
is described in greater detail below.
Course
Requirements
___ Psy 605, Clinical Research: Designs, methods
and ethics
___ Psy 607, Advanced Statistical Methods I
___ Psy 608 or 861/4, Advanced Statistical
Methods II
___ Psy 609, Multivariate Statistics
___ Psy 624, Clinical I: Psychopathology
___ Psy 654, Clinical II: Psychological
Assessment
___ Psy 751, Clinical III: Clinical Treatments:
Adult
___ Psy 778, Clinical IV: Clinical Treatments:
Child & family
___ Psy 611, History & Systems
___ Clinical Elective I
___ Clinical Elective II
___ Distribution (biological bases of behavior)
___ Distribution (cognitive-affective bases of behavior)
___ Distribution (social bases of behavior)
NOTE:
The university has a 72-credit rule that states that tuition will not be
waived for more than 72 credits of graduate study.
Below is a typical course sequence.
|
|
Fall |
Spring |
|
Year I |
Research |
Research |
|
|
Statistics I (607) |
Statistics II (608 or 681) |
|
|
Clinical I: Psychopathology (624) |
Clinical II: Psychological Assessment (654) |
|
|
Distribution or Clinical Elective |
Clinical Research (605) |
|
|
Brown Bag |
Brown Bag |
|
|
|
|
|
Year II |
Research |
Research |
|
|
Clinical III: Treatments: Adult (751) |
Clinical IV: Treatments: Child/family (778) |
|
|
Statistics III (609) |
Distribution or Clinical Elective |
|
|
Practicum (Intervention I) |
Practicum (Intervention II) |
|
|
Brown Bag |
Brown Bag |
|
|
|
|
|
Year III |
Research |
Research |
|
|
History & Systems |
Distribution or Clinical Elective |
|
|
Practicum (Intervention III) |
Practicum (Intervention IV) |
|
|
Distribution or Clinical Elective |
Distribution or Clinical Elective |
|
|
Brown Bag (Second Year Project Presentation) |
Brown Bag |
|
|
|
|
|
Year IV |
Research |
Research |
|
|
Placementa |
Placementa |
|
|
Brown Bag |
Brown Bag |
Ethical and
Professional Development
Students are
expected to develop an understanding of the issues underlying professional and
scientific responsibility and integrity.
We have elected to integrate this training into the program rather than
rely on a stand-alone course. Listed
below are some of the ways in which ethical concepts are presented in the
training program.
1. Each
student is expected to read and become thoroughly familiar with the APA Code of
Professional Ethics.
2. Issues
involving ethical and professional responsibility are included specifically,
and with assigned readings, in several of the area courses:
a) The APA Ethical Standards is assigned reading in Psychology 654, Clinical Assessment, the course in assessment taken by all
area students.
b) Ethical Standards are also discussed in Psychology 751, Clinical Interventions, another required course for all
area students. The course includes a
specific presentation and focus on ethical guidelines.
Preliminary Requirement
The preliminary requirement consists of three
components, a Second Year project, a Third Year project, and a Clinical
Competency requirement. For each of these components it is the responsibility
of the student to inform the area in writing of its completion using the
appropriate form shown in the appendix of this manual. In addition, for Second and Third Year
Projects a final copy of the approved paper must be filed in the clinical area
office. For the Clinical Competency
Requirement the prospectus compiled by the student (see description of the
requirement) must be filed in the clinical area office. A permanent file of
prelim papers is kept in the clinical psychology area office and is available
for the use of both students and faculty.
Each of these preliminary requirements produces
direct benefits for the student. The
professionally relevant educational benefits include, but are not limited to,
the following:
1. Close individual contact with committee
members, enabling the student to better understand and utilize the committee
member's intellectual viewpoints, knowledge, and experience and enabling the
faculty member to make sound evaluative judgments of the student.
2. Increase in experience, confidence, and
professional identification as a consequence of completing work of considerable
scope that faculty accept as meeting standards of performance applicable to the
doctoral program.
3. Furtherance of progress in the doctoral
program through the use of knowledge and skills in designing or completing
additional requirements such as the proposal for the doctoral dissertation, or
the dissertation itself.
4. Furtherance of professional career through
publication of the work or through presenting it in professional contexts such as
professional meetings, colloquia, seminars, or lectures.
5. Use of the work in other work contexts, such
as job interview, program planning and implementation, or research grant
applications.
Research Mentorship
The first step in the completion of the second and third
year preliminary requirements is to develop the skills necessary to accomplish
these tasks. Each student should at
all times during their graduate career work with a faculty member who has
an active research program. Each semester students are evaluated in regard
to their research activities with their mentor.
Second Year Preliminary Requirement (Second Year
Project)
Each student is required to complete an empirical
research project under the guidance of a chair and at least one additional
clinical area committee member.
Although known as the “Second Year Project,” work on this requirement
should begin during the first year of graduate school. The project must be completed by the end of
the fourth semester of graduate school.
The following steps are involved in completing this
requirement:
1. A formal written proposal for the research
project should be prepared by the student under the direction of the chair and
submitted to the remaining committee member(s) for review. The committee may meet with the student to
discuss the details of the proposal and approve the final design. Once approved, the student should file a
copy of the approved proposal signed by committee members with the secretary of
the clinical area group within ten days of its approval. This procedure is essentially equivalent to
the procedure used for the dissertation.
The proposal should normally be completed in the first year or, at the
very latest, the beginning of the second year of graduate study.
2. At the completion of the study the student
submits a written paper based on the study. This paper should follow APA style
and take the form of a manuscript that could potentially be submitted for
publication. The committee will read and evaluate the paper. At the discretion
of the committee the paper may need to be revised and resubmitted before it is
approved. Once approved, the paper
should be filed with the clinical area secretary, together with the approval
form signed by the committee (see appendix).
Students
are expected to present their Second Year Projects at the Clinical Area Brown
Bag in the fifth semester of graduate school. This presentation does not,
however, constitute part of the evaluation of the project.
Third Year Preliminary Requirement (Third Year
Project)
Each student is also required to complete a written
Third Year project under the guidance of a chair and at least one additional
clinical area committee member. The specific nature of the project will be
tailored to the needs of the student and hence various types of papers can
satisfy the Third Year preliminary requirement. These include, but are not
limited to, a critical review paper, a paper reporting a meta-analysis, a
theoretical paper, or a paper reporting empirical research. Whatever option is
chosen, the paper should be no longer than 50 double-spaced typed pages (using
Times New Roman 12 point font), including the reference section, tables,
figures etc. The paper must follow APA publication style.
The following steps are involved in completing this
requirement:
1. The student chooses a topic and prepares a statement of goals (maximum of two pages) which can be presented to prospective committee members. After some discussion with faculty, the student forms a committee.
2.
A
paper is prepared in consultation with the committee.
3. The committee evaluates and, if appropriate, approves the paper. Once approved, the paper should be filed with the clinical area secretary, together with the approval form signed by the committee (see Appendix).
Given the critical importance of the Second and Third
Year Preliminary Requirements in the training of the Ph.D. candidate, a waiver
of these requirements based on previous work will generally not be
granted.
Deadlines for Completion of Projects
The usual expectation is that the Second Year and
Third Year Projects will be completed by the end of the fourth and sixth
semesters, respectively. It is important for you to have a realistic sense of
the time pressures imposed by this system of deadlines. Most students should use their first year to
explore possible topics for their preliminary requirements, and to approach
faculty members about being on the committee.
If you cannot complete a project by the deadline, you may petition the
clinical faculty of the area for an extension.
This petition must be submitted no later than the date of the original
deadline.
NOTE WELL:
The chances of getting an extension for a Third Year Project are close
to zero. The faculty has been
traditionally resistant to such extensions, and grants them only in
extraordinary circumstances, usually involving personal health crises or
similar cataclysmic events. If an
extension is required for completion of the Second Year Project, you must
demonstrate that the project was begun early, pursued in earnest, and designed
intelligently, and that unpredictable circumstances have impeded the proper
collection of data or the proper analysis of data. Again, extensions are not routinely granted. The high expectation for quality in these
projects will mean that most papers will go through several drafts. You should anticipate that it will require
at least four months to bring a project from a complete initial draft to a
fully approved project.
Faculty are expected to read and promptly return
drafts of these major projects. The
operational definition of “promptly” is within three weeks. We feel students should not be penalized for
delays caused by faculty. Therefore,
anytime a faculty member holds a paper longer than three weeks, the time in
excess of three weeks becomes an automatic grace period. If there are delays on successive drafts,
these grace periods are summed. The
three-week rule does not apply to the summer months when faculty typically are
not paid and not required to read papers.
It is your responsibility to document delays in faculty reviews.
In a similar vein, students also have an obligation
to submit work in a timely manner. Specifically, materials to be evaluated must
be submitted at least three weeks prior to the scheduled examination date. When
work is not submitted in a timely manner the examination date will be
rescheduled to a time that is at least three weeks later than the date the work
was submitted. For students applying to internship, the dissertation proposal
must be successfully defended no later than two weeks before the deadline for
the first internship application.
Clinical
Competency Requirement
All students
must be certified by the faculty of the Clinical Psychology Area as clinically
competent before they can pursue the completion of a Ph.D. in clinical psychology.
Pre-Internship Evaluation.
Minimal
Didactic and Practicum Experience. The student must complete at least two year
long practica (four courses) beyond the Clinical Interventions courses. There should be non-overlapping supervision
among the courses so that each student will have been supervised by at least
two different clinical faculty supervisors before presenting credentials for
pre-internship clinical competence.
Clinical Competency Preliminary Requirement
The specific procedures by which a student becomes
certified as clinically competent at the pre-internship level are as follows:
1. The student should select a committee consisting of a minimum of two faculty in the clinical area who will conduct a clinical competency evaluation. The committee members should be familiar with the student's clinical work and development. The chair of this committee must be a regular member of the Clinical Area faculty. The student submits to the committee a clinical training prospectus, or self study which summarizes previous clinical training and experience and describes planned clinical training. The prospectus should include a list of all courses and practica completed and brief descriptions of clients seen (including the number of sessions, supervisors, and treatment plans for each client). The prospectus should also outline a plan for continued professional development (1) before starting the internship, (2) while on the internship, and (3) after the internship. In other words, the prospectus should be a concise (maximum of 3 pages) review of clinical training and training goals. This prospectus should be on file in the area office.
2. The student must prepare a written report for the committee describing an intervention which she or he has delivered (e.g., to an individual, couple, family, a group, a community). This report should aim to demonstrate that the student has a conceptual understanding of important aspects of clinical intervention and should demonstrate that the formulation of the intervention strategies was based on a set of principles that can be understood and discussed. Furthermore, the report should discuss the nature and extent of outcome evaluation and should reveal the student's level of clinical, as well as conceptual, skill in delivering the intervention. Ideally, this report should possess value as a teaching instrument for neophyte students. The student should also demonstrate that she or he can conceptualize and meaningfully discuss the problem addressed from a perspective other than the intervention that was chosen.
3. The committee will evaluate the report, review the student's clinical training and evaluative reports submitted by the student's supervisors, and conduct an oral examination. If the committee judges that the student has met the minimum standards for clinical competence in the Area, the student should file the prospectus referred to in section 1 with the clinical area secretary, together with the approval form signed by the committee.
More detailed guidelines for the clinical competency preliminary requirement
follow.
Goal:
To assess
students’ clinical skills, including skills in conceptualization, assessment,
intervention, clinical decision making, and the application of research
findings to clinical activities. Students are expected to demonstrate breadth
as well as depth in their thinking about clinical activities.
Oral Exam:
The oral exam will focus on the students’ ability to discuss the following aspects of an intervention of their choosing:
Conceptualization – identify the client (individual,
couple, family, organization, community etc) and describe the formulation used
to understand the client and to design the intervention.
Research
that informs the conceptualization - describe research findings that bear upon or support the
formulation.
Assessment
processes -
describe how the initial assessment was conducted and how ongoing assessment
over time was designed and conducted.
Process
and outcome of intervention - describe the course, progress, and outcome of the intervention and discuss factors
relevant to this course (e.g., specific gains made and what led to them,
ruptures in the working relationship with the client and how they were handled,
non-compliance and how that was handled, etc.)
Research
that informs the intervention - discuss the relevant intervention process and outcome
research.
Ethical
and socio-cultural/socio-political issues – identify ethical issues if relevant; discuss
larger social, environmental, or contextual factors that bear upon working with
this client (related, for example, to ethnicity, sexual orientation,
disabilities, gender issues, stigma, religion, managed care, etc.).
Alternative
conceptualization –
identify an alternative way of conceptualizing the case and describe its
implications for intervention. If you believe there is no plausible,
alternative way to conceptualize the case provide a clear and compelling
justification for this position. The goal here is to demonstrate your capacity
to think broadly about clinical assessment and intervention.
Students
should come to the orals prepared to discuss and respond to questions regarding
each area listed above.
Approved
Clinical Internship
In addition to
the preliminary certification of clinical competence, the student must complete
an approved internship. The student
may, upon completing ALL preliminary requirements, and receiving committee
approval of a doctoral dissertation proposal, apply to internship programs. The
area office maintains a file on APA approved settings. The student can assume that any APA-approved
internship that is primarily Clinical Psychology in nature will be approved by
the Area.
Post-Internship
Certification of Clinical Competence
In addition to
the pre-internship clinical competence certification, it is expected that a
student will complete an approved internship satisfactorily. An evaluation of performance will be obtained
from the internship agency. The
internship must be completed to the satisfaction of the internship agency for
the student to qualify for the Ph.D. degree.
Doctoral
Dissertation
Character of the Dissertation
The Ph.D. Dissertation must be a major piece of
research that is grounded in clear and meaningful psychological theory and is a
thoughtful, integrated, original research effort. The dissertation should address a substantive research problem in
psychology. The dissertation research
will be guided and evaluated by a Faculty committee selected by the student,
with consultation with the major professor.
Dissertation Committee
The student shall select a major professor who will
bear most of the responsibility for guidance.
In addition, three other faculty members will serve on the Dissertation
Committee. As described in the
Psychology Department Graduate Student Manual, two of the four committee
members must be from one of the areas within the Department. One faculty
member must be from a different area within the department. The fourth
committee member can be from any department at the University. In addition, the University requires that a
fifth committee member, selected from outside the Psychology Department, serve
as an outside reader. More details
concerning procedures for submitting the dissertation are contained in the
Psychology Department's Graduate Student Manual. In addition, students should consult the
Office of the Graduate School for the most current administrative details
concerning the deadlines for submission of programs, etc.
Time to Completion of the Degree
The graduate school requires that work toward a Ph.D.
degree must be completed within 7 years (official leaves of absence excluded)
from first registration date. The student
may petition for an extension of this deadline, but the area is reluctant to
recommend approval of such extensions.