University at Buffalo
QuickSearch





»  Home
»  Contact Us
»  What is Internal Audit
»  The Audit Process
»  Reporting Fraud
»  Policies and Procedures
»  Links and Audit Resources
»  Frequently Asked Questions
»  Site Map


Internal Audit
Types of Audits | Selecting Audits | Audit Phases | Requesting Audits

AUDIT PHASES

Although every audit is unique, the audit process is similar for most and usually consists of the following phases: The most successful audits are those in which a constructive collaboration is achieved between the area being reviewed and the auditor. To that end, we will make every effort to keep you informed. It is important that everyone involved understand the audit process.

As with any special project, an audit results in a certain amount of time being diverted from your department's usual routine. One of our objectives is to perform the audit efficiently and effectively to minimize the disruption of your ongoing activities.

ENTRANCE CONFERENCE
An audit begins with an initial meeting between the auditor and management from all interested offices and units. The entrance conference provides an opportunity for discussion of the audit process, the scope and objectives of the audit, the estimated completion date, and on-site work space requirements. It also provides management with an opportunity to discuss any questions or concerns they may have. Management's input at this stage will help us to establish a work plan to minimize audit time and avoid disruption of ongoing activities to the greatest extent possible. (top)

FIELDWORK
The first step of the actual audit consists of interviews with managers and staff, and a review of documents and data to gain a better understanding of the unit's operations. Transactions and records are then tested to determine if controls are operating as intended. Informal communication between the audit and unit management is maintained to avoid misunderstandings, and to ensure that there are no surprises in later stages of the audit. (top)

DRAFT AUDIT REPORT
After all fieldwork is completed, a draft report is prepared by the auditor. The report documents our objectives, procedures performed, our conclusions as to the adequacy of controls, and specific observations and recommendations for improvement if necessary. Internal Audit management reviews the draft thoroughly before it is presented to the unit's management. This draft report is prepared only for the unit's operating management and it provides the basis for discussions at the exit conference. (top)

EXIT CONFERENCE
Once the unit's management has had an opportunity to review the draft audit report, the auditor will contact them to arrange an exit conference. The purpose of this conference is to review the draft audit, verify that the audit results are correctly stated, solicit management comments on the implementation of the audit recommendations, and discuss any other issue related to the audit. Management may also take this opportunity to comment on the audit process and make suggestions for future audits. (top)

FINAL AUDIT REPORT
The final audit report is addressed to the Vice President responsible for the unit audited or the Provost. A copy of this report is sent to the unit administrator and the Vice President for University Services. This report includes unit management's comments and implementation schedule at the end of each recommendation. A copy of the campus follow-up policy is attached to each report. (top)

AUDIT REPORT FOLLOW-UP
The Internal Audit department is responsible for the periodic follow-up on the status of audit recommendations. This provides an opportunity for unit management to provide us with a summary of the status of each unresolved recommendation, including a timetable for its implementation. When these recommendations have not been fully implemented or scheduled for implementation within six months of the issue date of the report, the Vice President for University Services will be provided a copy of the unresolved recommendations. The Vice President for University Services will contact the Provost or appropriate Vice President to request an explanation of why appropriate action has not been taken to resolve the recommendations. If the recommendations remain unresolved during the next three-month period, the Office of the President will request an explanation of the circumstances that prevent their resolution. (top)