|
The Coming of the West:
The Western world had
for centuries been gradually penetrating most of the areas that had
once been part of the Muslim empire, and in the latter part of the
nineteenth century, in the vacuum left by the long decay and decline
of the Ottoman Empire, European powers came to dominate the Middle
East.
Among the first
Europeans to gain a foothold in the Middle East were the Venetians
who, as early as the thirteenth century, had established trading
posts in what are now Lebanon, Syria, and Egypt, and who controlled
much of the shipping between Arab and European ports. Then, in 1497,
five years after Ferdinand and Isabella ended Islamic rule in Spain,
Vasco da Gama led a fleet of four Portuguese ships around Africa and
in 1498 found a new sea route to India from Europe. Dutch, British,
and French frigates and merchantmen followed and began establishing
trading outposts along the shores of the Indian Ocean, eventually
undercutting both Venetian shipping and the Mediterranean trade on
which the Middle East had thrived for millennia.
The process of
European penetration was gradual and complex; but there were,
nevertheless, clearly identifiable turning points. In the sixteenth
century, for example, the Ottoman Empire voluntarily granted a
series of concessions called the "Capitulations" to European powers
- concessions which gave the Europeans decided advantages in foreign
trade in the empire. Another turning point was the invasion of Egypt
in 1798 by Napoleon Bonaparte. Hoping to cut Britain's lines to
India and cripple its maritime and economic power, Napoleon crushed
the Mamluks (who governed Egypt under Ottoman suzerainty) and
briefly occupied the country. By defeating Egypt, then still part of
the Ottoman Empire, Napoleon exposed the inner weaknesses, both
military and administrative, of the sultans, shattered the myth of
Ottoman power, and inaugurated more than 150 years of direct
political intervention by the West.
Europe's worldwide
nineteenth-century search for raw materials, markets, military
bases, and colonies eventually touched most of what had been the
Arab empire. In 1820 Great Britain imposed a pact on Arab tribes on
the coast of the Arabian Gulf; in the 1830s France occupied Algeria;
in 1839 Britain occupied Aden, at the strategic entrance to the Red
Sea; and in 1869 Ferdinand de Lesseps, with the backing of the
French emperor, completed what would become, and still is, one of
the key shipping arteries of the world, the Suez Canal.
Western culture
spread with Western economic and political control. In Lebanon
missionaries from several countries founded a network of schools and
universities. By introducing modern Western ideas these fostered the
growth of Arab nationalism, contributed to the revival of Arabic
literature, and provided a powerful impulse toward modernization. In
addition to education, contact with the West led to improvements in
medical care and the introduction of Western techniques in
agriculture, commerce, and industry. For the most part, however,
Western domination tended to benefit the nations of Europe at the
expense of the Arab world. Although the Suez Canal, for example, has
been of immense value to Egypt, the profits for nearly a century
went to European shareholders in the company that managed the canal.
Western and Western stimulated efforts to modernize parts of the
Middle East, moreover, often led Middle Eastern rulers to incur
debts which led to European financial control and then to European
political domination. It was such a series of steps that ended with
France occupying Tunisia in 1881 and Britain taking control of Egypt
in 1882. Later, in emulation, Italy in 1911 seized Libya.
Resistance to
European penetration took several forms. In the cities, Arab
intellectuals debated whether modernization or a return to their
roots would be the more effective path to the removal of foreign
dominance and, consequently, to independence. Elsewhere, Muslim
leaders such as the Mahdi in the Sudan and 'Abd al-Qadir al-Jazairi
in Algeria took direct action. These struggles were later
romanticized and distorted in a wave of books and films on, for
example, Gordon of Khartoum and the French Foreign Legion. Still
other intellectuals, such as the Egyptian Muhammad 'Abduh and his
Syrian disciple Rashid Rida, undertook to reform the Muslim
educational system and to restate Islamic values in terms of modern
concepts - needs deeply felt by most Muslim thinkers of the
nineteenth and twentieth centuries.
Western penetration
also drew the Middle East into the First World War, when the Ottoman
Empire sided with (Germany, and Great Britain, in response,
encouraged and supported the Arab Revolt against the Turks. By
promising aid - and ultimate independence from the Ottomans - Great
Britain encouraged the Arabs to launch a daring guerrilla campaign
against Turkish forces, a campaign widely publicized in press
coverage of T. E. Lawrence ("Lawrence of Arabia") and in Lawrence's
own writings.
By diverting Turkish
strength and blocking the Turkish-German route to the Red Sea and
India, the Arab Revolt contributed substantially to the Allied
victory, but it did not result in full independence for the Arab
lands. Instead, France and Great Britain secretly agreed to
partition most of the Arab provinces of the Ottoman Empire between
them and eventually obtained mandates from the League of Nations:
Britain over Iraq, Palestine, and Transjordan; France over Syria and
Lebanon. The mandates were inconsistent with British promises to the
Arabs and, furthermore, contrary to the recommendations of President
Wilson's King-Crane Commission, a group sent to the Middle East in
1919 specifically to ascertain the wishes of the Arab peoples.
The mandates,
however, were granted, thus extending Western control of the Middle
East and also setting the stage for one of the most tragic and
intractable conflicts of modern times: the conflict over Palestine
which has, since 1948, ignited four wars, sent masses of Palestinian
Arabs into exile, contributed to the energy crisis of 1973, and,
from 1975 on, fueled the civil war in Lebanon.
The conflict over
Palestine actually goes back to 1896, when Theodor Herzl published a
pamphlet called Der Judenstaat ("The Jewish State"), in which he
advocated British-backed Jewish colonization in Argentina or
Palestine - with the hope of eventually creating a sovereign Jewish
state. Herzl's writings and personal advocacy led to the formal
development of Zionism, a political movement dedicated to the
creation of such a state, and eventually focusing on Palestine. The
Zionist claim to Palestine was mainly based on the fact that there
had been periods of Hebrew rule in Canaan and the land west of the
Jordan River between 1300 B.C. and A.D. 70.
The Arabs considered
this claim to be without substance. Palestine, they pointed out, had
been part of the Islamic world almost continually for twelve
centuries; from 636 to the First World War. In 1917, however, Lord
Balfour, the British Foreign Secretary, issued the Baltour
Declaration, which promised British support for the establishment of
a "national home for the Jewish people" in Palestine providing that
"nothing shall he done which may prejudice the civil and religious
rights of existing non-Jewish communities" - a reference to the
Arabs, who then were 92 percent of the population. The declaration
was interpreted by key Zionist leaders as support for a sovereign
Jewish state, but this interpretation has been disputed. Both
Winston Churchill and Lord Balfour himself later said publicly that
"a national home" meant a cultural or religious center, a view that
America's King-Crane Commission independently presented.
Establishment of a national home did not imply a Jewish state, the
commission said.
In the wake of the
Balfour Declaration, and during the British mandate, Jewish
immigration increased. So, in proportion did sporadic strife between
Arabs and Jews. Immigration nevertheless continued and in the 1930s
- with the rise of Adolf Hitler - and after World War II, Jewish
immigration increased still further. As British efforts to control
it generated widespread disapproval in the West and stimulated
underground warfare by militant Zionist units against British
forces, Britain eventually placed the problem in the hands of the
United Nations, which in 1947 voted to partition Palestine into
Jewish and Arab States.
Fighting then flared
up in Palestine. Six months later, when Britain withdrew and
formation of the State of Israel was proclaimed, the Arabs went to
war against the newly declared nation. As Jewish forces were
victorious - and as stories spread that some 250 Arab civilians had
been massacred in a village called Deir Yassin - thousands of
Palestinians fled, among the first of today's 3.4 million refugees
and exiles. Eventually the United Nations negotiated a truce, but
fighting became endemic and war broke out again in 1956, 1967, and
1973. The 1967 war triggered underground warfare by Palestinian
militants, whose attacks were primarily aimed at Israel, but also
included strikes in Europe and hijackings on international air
routes.
In order to settle
the conflict, numerous United Nations Resolutions have been passed
calling for peace, the return of the refugees to their homes,
Israeli withdrawal from occupied territories, and the establishment
of permanent boundaries. Several Western nations have attempted
mediation, a Palestinian spokesman has argued the matter before the
General Assembly of the UN, and in 1977 President Sadat of Egypt
traveled to Jerusalem and appeared before the Israeli parliament in
an unprecedented peace initiative. President Carter of the United
States brought the leaders of Egypt and Israel together in the
United States and himself traveled to the Middle East in an attempt
to persuade at least these two countries to conclude a peace treaty,
and in March 1979 Egypt and Israel signed a treaty to which the
United States was also a signatory. Although it led to an
improvement in Egyptian-Israeli relations which resulted in Israeli
evacuation of some occupied Egyptian territory and the opening of
the Suez Canal to Israeli ships, however, this separate peace treaty
did nothing to bring about withdrawal of Israeli occupation forces
from East Jerusalem, the West Bank, and the Golan Heights of Syria
and left untouched the root cause of the entire problem- that is,
the status of the Palestinians. The immediate net result of the
treaty, in fact, was a general increase in tension in the Middle
East which manifested itself in an apparent increase in Israeli
intransigence in the occupied territories and the isolation of Egypt
from the rest of the Arab world, including those countries on which
it has been most heavily dependent for economic and political
backing and which were opposed to the separate treaty because it
failed to achieve a permanent and comprehensive peace.

 |