|
The Rightly Guided Caliphs:
With the death of
Muhammad, the Muslim community was faced with the problem of
succession. Who would be its leader? There were four persons
obviously marked for leadership: Abu Bakr al-Siddiq, who had not
only accompanied Muhammad to Medina ten years before, but had been
appointed to take the place of the Prophet as leader of public
prayer during Muhammad's last illness; 'Umar ibn al-Khattab, an able
and trusted Companion of the Prophet; 'Uthman ibn 'Affan, a
respected early convert; and 'Ali ibn Abi Talib, Muhammad's cousin
and son-in-law. To avoid contention among various groups, 'Umar
suddenly grasped Abu Bakr's hand, the traditional sign of
recognition of a new leader. Soon everyone concurred and before dusk
Abu Bakr had been recognized as the khalifah of Muhammad. Khalifah-
anglicized as caliph - is a word meaning "successor" but also
suggesting what his historical role would be: to govern according to
the Quran and the practice of the Prophet.
Abu Bakr's caliphate
was short but important. An exemplary leader, he lived simply,
assiduously fulfilled his religious obligations, and was accessible
and sympathetic to his people. But he also stood firm when, in the
wake of the Prophet's death, some tribes renounced Islam; in what
was a major accomplishment, Abu Bakr swiftly disciplined them.
Later, he consolidated the support of the tribes within the Arabian
Peninsula and subsequently funnelled their energies against the
powerful empires of the East: the Sassanians in Persia and the
Byzantines in Syria, Palestine, and Egypt. In short, he demonstrated
the viability of the Muslim state.
The second caliph, 'Umar-
appointed by Abu Bakr in a written testament - continued to
demonstrate that viability. Adopting the title Amir al-Muminin,
"Commander of the Believers," 'Umar extended Islam's temporal rule
over Syria, Egypt, Iraq, and Persia in what from a purely military
standpoint were astonishing victories. Within four years after the
death of the Prophet the Muslim state had extended its sway over all
of Syria and had, at a famous battle fought during a sandstorm near
the River Yarmuk, blunted the power of the Byzantines - whose ruler
Heraclius had shortly before disdainfully rejected the letter from
the unknown Prophet of Arabia.
Even more
astonishingly, the Muslim state administered the conquered
territories with a tolerance almost unheard of in that age. At
Damascus, for example, the Muslim leader Khalid ibn al-Walid signed
a treaty which read as follows:
This is what Khalid
ibn al-Walid would grant to the inhabitants of Damascus if he enters
therein: he promises to give them security for their lives, property
and churches. Their city wall shall not be demolished, neither shall
any Muslim be quartered in their houses. Thereunto we give them the
pact of Allah and the protection of His Prophet, the caliphs and the
believers. So long as they pay the poll tax, nothing but good shall
befall them.
This tolerance was
typical of Islam. A year after Yarmuk, 'Umar, in the military camp
of al-Jabiyah on the Golan Heights, received word that the
Byzantines were ready to surrender Jerusalem and rode there to
accept the surrender in person. According to one account, he entered
the city alone and clad in a simple cloak, astounding a populace
accustomed to the sumptuous garb and court ceremonials of the
Byzantines and Persians. He astounded them still further when he set
their fears at rest by negotiating a generous treaty in which he
told them:
In the name of God
... you have complete security for your churches which shall not be
occupied by the Muslims or destroyed.
This policy was to
prove successful everywhere. In Syria, for example, many Christians
who had been involved in bitter theological disputes with Byzantine
authorities- and persecuted for it- welcomed the coming of Islam as
an end to tyranny. And in Egypt, which 'Amr ibn al-'As took from the
Byzantines after a daring march across the Sinai Peninsula, the
Coptic Christians not only welcomed the Arabs, but enthusiastically
assisted them.
This pattern was
repeated throughout the Byzantine Empire. Conflict among Greek
Orthodox, Syrian Monophysites, Copts, and Nestorian Christians
contributed to the failure of the Byzantines - always regarded as
intruders - to develop popular support, while the tolerance which
Muslims showed toward Christians and Jews removed the primary cause
for opposing them.
'Umar adopted this
attitude in administrative matters as well. Although he assigned
Muslim governors to the new provinces, existing Byzantine and
Persian administrations were retained wherever possible. For fifty
years, in fact, Greek remained the chancery language of Syria,
Egypt, and Palestine, while Pahlavi, the chancery language of the
Sassanians, continued to be used in Mesopotamia and Persia.
'Umar, who served as
caliph for ten years, ended his rule with a significant victory over
the Persian Empire. The struggle with the Sassanid realm had opened
in 687 at al-Qadisiyah, near Ctesiphon in Iraq, where Muslim cavalry
had successfully coped with elephants used by the Persians as a kind
of primitive tank. Now with the Battle of Nihavand, called the
"Conquest of Conquests," 'Umar sealed the fate of Persia; henceforth
it was to be one of the most important provinces in the Muslim
Empire.
His caliphate was a
high point in early Islamic history. He was noted for his justice,
social ideals, administration, and statesmanship. His innovations
left all enduring imprint on social welfare, taxation, and the
financial and administrative fabric of the growing empire.
After the death of 'Umar
an advisory council composed of Companions of the Prophet selected
as the third caliph 'Uthman, during whose rule the first serious
strains on Islamic unity would appear. 'Uthman achieved much during
his reign. He pushed forward with the pacification of Persia,
continued to defend the Muslim state against the Byzantines, added
what is now Libya to the empire, and subjugated most of Armenia. 'Uthman
also, through his cousin Mu'awiyah ibn Abi Sufyan, the governor of
Syria, established an Arab navy which fought a series of important
engagements with the Byzantines.
Of much greater
importance to Islam, however, was 'Uthman's compilation of the text
of the Quran as revealed to the Prophet. Realizing that the original
message from God might be inadvertently distorted by textual
variants, he appointed a committee to collect the canonical verses
and destroy the variant recensions. The result was the text that is
accepted to this day throughout the Muslim world.
This eighth
century manuscript
from Mecca or
Medina is one of the two
oldest known
existing copies of the Quran.
These successes,
however, were qualified by serious administrative weaknesses. 'Uthman
was accused of favoritism to members of his family - the clan of
Umayyah. Negotiations over such grievances were opened by
representatives from Egypt but soon collapsed and 'Uthman was killed
- an act that caused a rift in the community of Islam that has never
entirely been closed.
This rift widened
almost as soon as 'Ali, cousin and son-in-law of the Prophet, was
chosen to be the fourth caliph. At issue, essentially, was the
legitimacy of 'Ali's caliphate. 'Uthman's relatives - in particular
Mu'awiyah, the powerful governor of Syria, where 'Ali's election had
not been recognized - believed 'Ali's caliphate was invalid because
his election had been supported by those responsible for 'Uthman's
unavenged death. The conflict came to a climax in 657 at Siffin,
near the Euphrates, and eventually resulted in a major division
between the Sunnis or Sunnites and the Shi'is (also called Shi'ites
or Shi'ah), the "Partisans" of 'Ali- a division that was to color
the subsequent history of Islam.
Actually the Sunnis
and the Shi'is are agreed upon almost all the essentials of Islam.
Both believe in the Quran and the Prophet, both follow the same
principles of religion and both observe the same rituals. However,
there is one prominent difference, which is essentially political
rather than religious, and concerns the choice of the caliph or
successor of Muhammad.
The majority of
Muslims support the elective principle which led to the choice of
Abu Bakr as the first caliph. This group is known as ahl alsunnah
wa-l-jama'ah, "the people of custom and community," or Sunnis, who
consider the caliph to be Muhammad's successor only in his capacity
as ruler of the community. The main body of the Shi'is, on the other
hand, believes that the caliphate - which they call the imamate or
"leadership" - is nonelective. The caliphate, they say, must remain
within the family of the Prophet - with 'Ali the first valid caliph.
And while Sunnis consider the caliph a guardian of the shari'ah, the
religious law, the Shi'is see the imam as a trustee inheriting and
interpreting the Prophet's spiritual knowledge.
After the battle of
Siffin, 'Ali - whose chief strength was in Iraq, with his capital at
Kufa - began to lose the support of many of his more uncompromising
followers and in 661 he was murdered by a former supporter. His son
Hasan was proclaimed caliph at Kufa but soon afterward deferred to
Muiawiyah, who had already been proclaimed caliph in Jerusalem in
the previous year and who now was recognized and accepted as caliph
in all the Muslim territories - thus inaugurating the Umayyad
dynasty which would rule for the next ninety years.
The division between
the Sunnis and the Shi'is continued to develop in 680 when Ali's son
Husayn along with his followers was brutally killed at Karbala in
Iraq by the forces of the Umayyad ruler Yazid. His death is still
commemorated every year during the Islamic month of Muharram.

 |