| Regular
colloquia are Wednesdays, 2:00-4:00 p.m., 280 Park Hall, North (Amherst)
Campus, and are open to the public. Refreshments are served.
Other colloquia
and our distinguished speaker are on different days.
| Month |
Day |
Speaker/Title
|
| September |
9 |
Leonard
Talmy ( talmy@acsu.buffalo.edu)
Center for Cognitive Science and Department of Linguistics,
UB
"Relating Language to Other Cognitive
Systems"
|
|
16 |
|
|
23 |
David
L. Mark, (dmark@acsu.buffalo.edu)
Department of Geogrpahy, National Center for Geographic
Information and Analysis (NCGIA),and Center for Cognitive
Science, UB
and
Barry Smith(psysmith@acsu.buffalo.edu)
Department of Philosophy and Center for Cognitive Science,
UB
"Cognition, Ontology and Geographic
Information Science"
|
|
30 |
|
| October |
7 |
Paul
Thagard (University of Waterloo, Dept. of Philosophy)
"Emotional Analogies: How People Use Analogies in Persuasion,
Empathy, and Humor"
|
|
14 |
|
|
21 |
Jonathan
Dostrovsky (University of Toronto, Dept. of Physiology)
|
|
28 |
|
| November |
4 |
|
|
11 |
|
|
18 |
Ralph
Benedict (UB, Dept. of Neurology)
"Functional Neuroimaging of Auditory Attention Using
a Continuous Performance Test"
|
|
25 |
|
| December |
2 |
|
|
9 |
Stuart
C. Shapiro ( shapiro@cse.buffalo.edu)
Center for Cognitive Science and Department of Computer
Science and Engineering, UB
"Embodied Cassie"
|
| |
|
|
Abstracts
Wednesday,
September 9, 1998
2:00-3:30 p.m.
280 Park Hall
North Campus
LEONARD
TALMY, Ph.D.
Center for Cognitive Science and Dept. of Lingusitics, UB
"Relating
Language to Other Cognitive Systems"
An important
research direction in cognitive science consists of cross-comparing
the forms of organization exhibited by different cognitive systems,
with the long-range aim of ascertaining the overall character of
human cognitive organization. Relatively distinct major cognitive
systems of this sort would seem to include: language, (different
modalities of) perception, reasoning and understanding, affect,
attention, memory, and cultural structure. Much of my work, in particular,
has sought to relate the conceptual structuring exhibited by language
to the structuring that is exhibited by other cognitive systems.
The general finding is that each cognitive system has some structural
properties that may be uniquely its own; some further structural
properties that it shares with only one or a few other cognitive
systems; and some fundamental structural properties that it has
in common with all the cognitive systems. It appears that each such
cognitive system resembles and interacts with other cognitive systems
more than is envisaged by the strict modularity notion. I term this
view the "overlapping systems" model of cognitive organization.
To illustrate, both language and visual perception have in common
such structuring factors as the schematization of spatial relations
between objects. But some factors with a significant structural
role in visual perception -- such as symmetry, rotation, and dilation
-- are at best minimally represented in the closed-class forms of
languages. And conversely, linguistic closed-class forms express
such categories as `reality status' -- e.g., inflections that represent
a proposition as factual, conditional, potential, or counterfactual
-- that have little part in visual perception. The talk will mainly
examine this partial overlap between language and vision. If time
permits, it will proceed to comparisons of language with the affect
system, the culture system, and the understanding system, and end
by examining structuring factors that appear to operate across all
the major cognitive systems.
Back
to Top
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wednesday,
September 16, 1998
2:00-3:30 p.m.
280 Park Hall
North Campus
BRIAN MACWHINNEY, Ph.D.
Department
of Psychology
Carnegie-Mellon University
"The
Emergence of Grammar from Perspective-Talking"
We can think
of language as a system that allows human beings to assume and enact
alternative specifically human perspectives that are grounded on
the realities of physical existence. Perspective-taking operates
on four distinct levels that correspond to major levels of primate
cognition. These four levels are: affordances, spatio-temporal reference
frames, causal action chains, and social frames. Affordances allow
us to ground our understanding of particular lexical items on sensory
and motor realities. Spatio-temporal reference frames allow us to
generalize the ego-centered perspective to object-centered and environment-centered
reference frames. The linguistic expression of spatio-temporal frames
is concentrated on adverbial phrases, but the results affect the
whole pattern of accessibility for mental models. Causal action
chains allow us to understand the actions of objects in terms of
movements and changes of our own bodies. The linguistic expression
of these chains strongly influences basic processes in clausal grammar.
Social frames allow us to shift between the perspectives of different
social actors. The linguistic expression of this level of perspective-taking
focuses on discourse structure and the interpretations of socially
complex lexical items. Although these four systems are supported
by partially separate dynamic neural pathways, the overall control
of perspective-taking and perspective shifting is achieved through
the interaction of language with prefrontal processes. The full
interaction of language with the four embodied systems gives rise
to the construction of an internalized homunculus that is then available
for the control language comprehension, language production, inner
speech, and problem-solving. By tracing through the on-line incremental
processing of sentences during production and comprehension, we
can observe the operations of perspective-taking as it threads across
alternative perspectives on these four levels.
Back
to Top
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wednesday,
September 23, 1998
2:00-3:30 p.m.
280 Park Hall
North Campus
DAVID MARK, Ph.D.
Department
of Geogrpahy,
National Center for Geographic Information and Analysis (NCGIA),
and Center for Cognitive Science
BARRY
SMITH
Department
of Philosophy and Center for Cognitive Science
"Cognition,
Ontology and Geographic Information Science"
Geographic categories
are structured differently from categories for closed, portable
objects at table-top scales. Geographic objects are not merely located
in space, they are tied to space intrinsically, in a manner that
implies that they inherit from space many of its structural (part/whole,
topological, geometrical) properties. In addition, to a much greater
extent than in the world of table-top objects, the realization that
a thing or type of thing exists at all may have individual or cultural
variability. Moreover, the boundaries of geographic objects are
themselves salient phenomena for purposes of categorization. Such
boundaries may be crisp or graded, open or closed, and they may
be subject to dispute.
Mark and Smith
will describe their current work on geographic categories and its
relation to the work of Rosch and others. They will also outline
plans for the empirical testing of a general ontological theory
of geographic objects and categories, and set these plans in relation
to other cognitively oriented research in the NCGIA, including the
recently approved interdisciplinary training grant under the NSF's
IGERT scheme.
Back
to Top
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wednesday,
October 7, 1998
2:00-3:30 p.m.
280 Park Hall
North Campus
PAUL
THAGARD, Ph.D.
University
of Waterloo
Department of Psychology
Emotional
Analogies: How People Use Analogies in Persuasion,Empathy, and Humor
People frequently
use analogies when they are trying to persuade others to agree with
them, when they are trying to understand each other, and when they
are making jokes. This talk will present a cognitive theory of the
role of emotions in such analogies. The theory extends previous
computational accounts of coherence and analogy to encompass emotion,
and proposes a novel understanding of analogical inference.
Back
to Top
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wednesday,
October 21, 1998
2:00-3:30 p.m.
280 Park Hall
North Campus
JONATHAN
DOSTROVSKY, Ph.D.
University
of Toronto
Deprtments of Physiology and Speech
Language Pathology
Director, Program in Neuroscience
BRAIN
MAPS AND PHANTOM LIMBS
It is now well
known from animal studies that the representation of the body's
surface, at least at the cortical level, is quite plastic. In particular,
following removal of input from a given body region, the representations
of the surrounding regions expand into the deafferented region.
However the functional/perceptual consequences of these alterations
are not known. Furthermore, following amputation of a limb most
people retain an image of the amputated limb and can experience
sensations in the phantom. The underlying mechanisms are not well
understood. I will describe studies involving recordings of sensory
neurons and the perceptual effects of electrical stimulation at
such sites in the thalamus of awake patients undergoing stereotactic
surgery for relief of pain following amputation. The findings provide
new insights regarding plasticity and phantoms.
Back
to Top
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wednesday,
October 28, 1998
280 Park Hall
2:00-3:30 p.m.
North Campus
DAVID
HUNTER, Ph.D.
Department
of Philosophy
Buffalo State College
States
and Identity
The Identity
Thesis in the philosophy of mind holds that a person's mental states
are identical with physical states, typically brain states. Proponents
of this view have claimed that the identities in question are empirical
and contingent truths, and that a given mental state might, in different
species or different members of one species, be identical with physical
states of different types. This thesis raises important questions
about the nature of states, and about the logic of identity claims
involving states. Just what is a state, and what does it mean to
say that a mental state is identical with a brain state? I begin
by proposing an account of the nature and logic of states, according
to which states are simply property instantiations. I distinguish
several versions of the Identity Thesis and argue that, given this
account, the Identity Thesis does not support the claims made by
its proponents. I suggest that some of these are best viewed as
concerning the claim that mental states supervene on physical states.
I then argue that rejecting the account of the logic and ontology
of states yields identity statements that are but a stylistic variant
on statements about the supervenience of the mental on the physical.
My tentative conclusion is that physicalists about the mind are
better served by defending a supervenience claim, than an identity
claim.
Back
to Top
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wednesday,
November 4, 1998
280
Park Hall
2:00-3:30 p.m.
North Campus
DANA
H. BALLARD, Ph.D.
Department
of Computer Science
University of Rochester
Deictic
Behaviors
We argue that
a computational theory of the brain will have to address the issue
of computational hierarchies, wherein the brain can be seen as using
different instruction sets at different spatio-temporal scales.
As examples, we describe two such abstraction levels.
At a timescale
of one-third of a second, a language is needed to address the way
the brain directs the physical resources of its body. An example
of these kinds of instructions would be those used to direct saccadic
eye- movements. Interpreting experimental data from this perspective
implies that subjects select eye-movements in a special strategy
to avoid loading short-term memory. This constraint has implications
for the organization of high- level behavior.
At a timescale
of 50 milliseconds we consider a model of instructions which capture
the details of programming the individual eye-movements themselves.
This model makes extensive use of feedback. The implications of
this are that brain circuitry may be far more dependent on the context
of a task than traditionally proposed.
Back
to Top
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wednesday,
November 11, 1998
280
Park Hall
2:00-3:30 p.m.
North Campus
ELLEN
BIALYSTOK, Ph.D.
Department
of Psychology
York University
Languages,
Scripts, and Bilingualism:
Learning the Meaning of Print
In order to
read, children must understand that the relationship between the
written forms and the meanings they represent is symbolic. Thus,
children's mental representation of the nature and function of print
needs to be represented symbolically as well. This symbolic relationship
between print and meaning includes two insights. The first is the
general principle that the written forms wholly determine the meaning;
the second is the specific principle that determines how the forms
signify meaning in that script. In alphabetic languages, for example,
letters stand for sounds. Both insights come after children appear
to have learned the written forms. Several studies are reviewed
that show that children know the forms (e.g., letters) before they
know that they are symbols and that bilingual children come to understand
aspects of the symbolic function of these forms earlier than monolingual
children do. Further, the writing systems used in the two languages
of the bilingual determine how the development of each of these
insights will proceed. Finally, the pattern performance demonstrated
by the bilinguals is discussed in terms of different processes of
representation and attention established by bilingual children from
a very early age.
Back
to Top
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wednesday,
November 18, 1998
280
Park Hall
2:00-3:30 p.m.
North Campus
RALPH
H. BENEDICT, Ph.D.
Department
of Neurology
University at Buffalo
Functional
Neuroimaging of Auditory Attention
Using a Continuous Performance Test
The general
emphasis of this colloquium is the relationship between cognition
and cerebral function. While no unitary model of attention has gained
wide acceptance in the cognitive science literature, scientists
have repeatedly emphasized three aspects or components of attention:
(1) capacity demand, (2) vigilance, and (3) selection. Functional
neuroimaging methods provide a means of determining the cerebral
correlates of theses constructs. Neuropsychological models have
been proposed (eg Posner) which account for attention task performance
in humans, but these models have emphasized the visual modality.
The degree to which Posner's model accounts for attention in a different
modality (eg audition) is not known. The results of a preliminary
study on auditory attention using positron emission tomography (PET)
will be presented. It is concluded that an area of the brain, the
anterior cingulate gyrus, can be identified which is active during
high-capacity demand attention, across sensory modalities. This
anterior brain region is distinguishable from posterior regions
which appear to be involved in the sensory aspects of cognitive
processing, but not in attention, per se. An intriguing area for
future research concerns the overlap (anatomically speaking) between
regions concerned with high- capacity demand attention and motor
function. An experiment designed to isolate these functions will
be presented.
Back
to Top
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wednesday,
November 25, 1998
280 Park Hall
2:00-3:30 p.m.
North Campus
SIDNEY
SEGALOWITZ, Ph.D.
Department
of Psychology
Brock University
Pushing
around the P300 event-related potential:
Attentional control and allocation
Scalp EEG can
be used to reflect some aspects of information processing in the
brain, especially when segments of EEG are time-locked to stimulus
presentation and then averaged, forming an averaged event-related
potential (ERP). One of the major components of the ERP is the P300
(or P3) peak, which is traditionally thought to reflect the updating
of stimulus information in working memory. I will present a series
of studies that show that the P300 reflects attentional allocation
rather than memory per se; I will then apply present results from
our studies using this paradigm to see the effects of alcohol, caffeine,
and mild head injury on the allocation of attention.
Back
to Top
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wednesday,
December 9, 1998
280 Park Hall
2:00-3:30 p.m.
North Campus
STUART
SHAPIRO, Ph.D.
Department
of Computer Science and Engineering and
Center for Cognitive Science, UB
Embodied
Cassie
We have enhanced
a computational cognitive agent by embodying it with real and simulated
bodies operating in real and simulated worlds. This has allowed
us to experiment with various ways that embodiment influences the
creation and meaning of the agent's beliefs and other terms in its
knowledge base, including: symbol-grounding by perception and action;
first-person privileged knowledge; the representation and use of
indexicals; having a personal sense of time; and low-level bodily
awareness.
Back
to Top
|