Supporting Family Health Care Decisions

Laws in Other States

Use the [BACK] button on your browser to return to this page

Case Law
New York and Missouri have been the two states long known to require "clear and convincing evidence" of a patient's wish to forgo a specific life sustaining treatment. Missouri's stringent requirement for such evidence was upheld by the US Supreme Court in Cruzan v. Director Missouri Dept. of Health in 1990. Michigan now appears to also require this standard of evidence following the 1995 Michigan Supreme Court ruling in Re: Martin.

Other states permit surrogate decision making because of the case law in those states, or with specific statutes. Below are some examples of such statutes. There are also some states in which recent court rulings have affected this process.

A case of related interest in California is Conservatorship of Wendland, discussed here by attorney Lawrence Nelson. Also, see ACLU article, and for an opposing view: Robert's Legacy. Other Wendland articles are at: Wendland links page.

A Wisconsin case, Spahn v. Eisenberg, 543 N.W.2d 485 (Wis. 1997)--also in PDF-- and a Kentucky case, DeGrella v. Elston, 858 S.W.2d 698 (Ky. 1993). raise similar issues.

Statutes

For more information, E-mail Family Decision Coalition
For questions about website, E-mail Jack Freer