The Sunday Times [Perth]. March 3, 1996 ACADEMICS WIN PROBE The University of WA Senate inquiry into its four-year-old archaeology row was sparked by two senior academics. The inquiry is primarily into why Dr David Rindos was not given permanent tenure. Its terms of reference do not specifically refer to allegations of sexual impropriety by Profes- sor Sandra Bowdler. A letter from Professor Charles Oxnard and Associate Professor Neville Bruce was sent to Chancellor Mr Justice Kenne- dy, Pro-Chancellor Dr Alex Cohen and four other academic senators to coincide with this week's senate meeting. UWA's top executives. Vice- Chancellor Professor Fay Gale and her deputy, Professor Alan Robson, were not sent copies. One of the academics at the centre of the dispute, Dr David Rindos, said he hoped the senate inquiry would be open and not just a whitewash. He was concerned it would be a closed inquiry. Professor Oxnard was head of the division of agriculture and science which oversaw the archaeology department. Professor Bruce was the convenor of the committee that reviewed the archaeology department in 1991. They told the senators they were gravely concerned about problems that had arisen due to the scandal. This concern is especially precipitated because the matter, until now handled internally and confidentially by the university executive. has become public through documents tabled in Parliament," they wrote. There is at least prima facie evidence in the form of docu- ments tabled in Parliament that imply: ù Students' complaints--in both interviews and letters -- about inequitable personal and academic treatment resulting from Professor Sandra Bowd- ler's activities over many years have been ignored ù The university's image, as reflected in letters and other communications from interna- tional scholars about the non- tenure of Dr David Rindos, has been seriously damaged. Professors Oxnard and Bruce said several academics had tried to help UWA executives whose mishandling of the case had resulted in the involvement of the WA Ombudsman and State Parliament, which is set to launch a separate inquiry. 'None of this appears to have had any effect," they wrote. "We believe if we, as a univer- sity, persist in this course of action, then we forfeit our claim to be a premier university and a community of scholars and we may be forced to accept what- ever sanctions external bodies may wish to place upon us. "We urge this letter be passed to the senate and members of the academic board and that they study the primary docu- ments tabled in Parliament and any other evidence they can obtain, discuss the matter in open hearing, then call for appropriate actions." This week's senate meeting appointed four senators to examine documents from a 1991 review of Professor Bowdler's department and the reasons UWA refused to continue employing Dr Rindos. The committee members are Federal Court judge Robert Nicholson, WA Water Corpora- tion chief Dr Jim Gill, St Hilda's principal Ms June Jones, and WA businessman Mr Irwin Barrett-Lennard. But in a statement, Professor Gale said the inquiry was launched because UWA had noted current media interest in the archaeology scandal and Dr Rindos's denial of tenure. Its terms of reference failed to include specific reference to Pro- fessor Bowdler who, according to documents tabled in Parliament, preyed on female students. 'The senate has refrained from engaging in public debate about these matters as it has been made clear by the WA Industrial Commission that, as far as Dr Rindos is concerned, the proper process for him to follow -is to take his case to UWA's Visitor, the Governor Major-General Michael Jeffery. Dr Rindos has indicated on several occasions he would be taking this course of action. He has not done so, however. In the meantime, the media speculation appears to have grown to a point at which the senate feels it is not in the university's best interests to remain inactive