DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH

GRADUATE COURSE DESCRIPTIONS

SPRING 2005

 

 

 

 

 

 

ENG 509 – CHAUCER

          Prof. Mili Clark

          Thursday 12:30-3:10, Clemens 436

          Registration Numbers: (A) 402266  

 

 

The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne . . .

 

Once they acclimatized themselves to Middle English, my undergraduate Chaucer students used to exclaim, “Chaucer is so modern!” (or “so timeless.  His characters can be found everywhere today;” or “I have an aunt who’s just like the Wife of Bath”).  I would never discourage undergraduates from believing this commonplace if it is what keeps them reading Chaucer.  However, Chaucer’s works—his characters, his tropes, his sentiments—comprise the strata of an archeology.

 

Compressed, sometimes neatly, sometimes haphazardly, beneath the surface of his texts, are genres, themselves within genres, which, the deeper you dig, the farther back in the particular site of a text of you go, you unearth other authors, other texts, other centuries, other cultures.  The tale of Constance in The Man of Law’s Tale, for instance, takes you down through saints’ lives to the Greek Romances; the imperiled virtuous heroine does not stop with Chaucer but continues up through Renaissance drama and the Victorian novel to the serials of the silent film; though the 20th century is full of imperiled heroines, I’m not sure their virtue matches that of their predecessors, and if not, do they belong in this particular archeology?

 

On the whole, Chaucer’s attitude toward the archeology of texts was positive.  Textual layering provides richness and authenticity, and, very important for the medieval writer, keeps the past alive in the present.  If old books were gone, the key of remembrance would be lost, says Chaucer in the proem to the Legend of Good Women.  Not endued with modern ideals of originality, medieval poets expected to “redo” the texts of poets that came before them, as Chaucer composed his own versions of French dream visions, Italian narratives, and vulgar tales (fabliaux) from everywhere.  Still, he does lament that past poets have taken all the good grain from the field of literature and left him “glenyng here and there . . . to fine an ere / Of any goodly word that [they] han left.”  When a genre, a tale, or a trope, has been done and redone by successive poets, what is

 

 

left for the present poet to do?  Rather than blend himself into a poetic tradition by adding his layer to the strata of literary archeology, Chaucer became the archeologist, exposing the workings of genres, tales, tropes, characters.  Like my undergraduates, he claims at least once that tropes and national cultures and languages are but dressing on the essentials of human nature.  Whatever the customs and forms of speech of the ancient Trojans, they succeeded as well in love as we do today, he comments on the text he is writing (Troilus and Criseyde).  However, at the end of the latter work (is it the first novel in English? or a proto-18C closet drama?), he seems to say that those who lived before Christianity were essentially different from those who came after.

Well, this course description is a long prologue to a tale in itself.  We’ll read the dream visions, Troilus and Criseyde, and most Canterbury Tales, along with some key Chaucerian sources.  Because I want graduate students to read Chaucer for their own pleasure and enlightenment, and because we will be reading in Middle English, I am not requiring a major paper at the end of the course.  We’ll have collaborative in-class presentations, weekly response posting to Blackboard, surveys of the literature on particular texts (annotated bibliographies).  NOTE:  There is only an “A” section.  You can count ENG 509 as one of your 10 seminars or as an extra seminar (which won’t affect your seminar requirement).

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ENG 516 – TEACHING SHAKESPEARE

          Prof. Barbara Bono

          Tuesday 4:10-6:50, Talbert 103

          Registration Number: 153253

 

This is a course in teaching Shakespeare.  It is designed explicitly for students who imagine that they will be presented with the challenge and the pleasure of teaching our most prominent canonical author in junior high, high school, or college settings.

 

Shakespeare’s texts—in their linguistic density, their dramatic intensity, their cultural awareness, their communal impact—did important and controversial cultural work in their own day, and they can continue to do so now.  In this course we will use some of the methods of the Folger Shakespeare Library’s long-standing NEH-sponsored “Teaching Shakespeare  Institute”—journal writing, wordplay, soliloquy analysis, adaptative and improvised scenarios, scene work, comparison of videos—

Coupled with the instructor’s historical focus on the confluence of political and sex-gender issues, to remake and reinvigorate Shakespeare’s texts for today’s students.

 

Class will focus on three of the most commonly taught Shakspeare plays from his four major genres—from the romantic comedies, A Midsummer Night’s Dream; from the history plays, 1 Henry IV; from the tragedies, Hamlet;--coupled with Russ McDonald’s excellent Bedford Companion to Shakespeare as background and source book.  In addition, we may take illustrative examples from other plays commonly taught in the lower-grade curriculum: from the romantic comedies, Twelfth Night/ from the histories, Richard III and Henry V; from the tragedies Romeo and Juliet, Julius Caesar, Othello, Macbeth, and Lear; from the romances The Tempest.  The instructor, herself a member of the summer 1996 “Teaching Shakespeare Institute” and the recipient of both the Chancellor’s Award and the Milton Plesur Award for excellence in teaching, looks forward to sharing the intellectual and community-building force of these plays with her students so that they can share them with theirs.  Format will be highly participatory; evaluation will be largely conducted around the actual production of materials—journals, exercises, lesson plans, scenarios, research project—to be used in future classrooms. 

 

 

ENG 542 – 20TH CENTURY AMERICAN POETRY

          Prof. Myung Mi Kim

          Thursday 12:30-3:10, Clemens 412

          Registration Numbers: (A)  367013  (B) 267307

This seminar will be devoted to close readings of twentieth century American exploratory long poems in an attempt to consider how the conditions of writing/making problematize and negotiate with the politics of time. How do experiments in the long poem participate in tests of radical materiality, process, and the architectonics of multivalent forms to transcribe and render historical consciousness? It will be our task throughout the semester to track how the practice of the exploratory long poem refunctions the spatiotemporal mark (of perception, of configurations of meaningmaking). How does the poem tend the valence of duration, lived time, memory, domesticated time, commodified time? We will track the long poem as it notates interval, disruption, series, seriality, sequence, recurrence, periodicity, citation, interruption, accretion: in relation daily and social practices, the meaning of rehearsing the Imaginary and its radicalizing potential possibilities for human agency and collective action.

Proposed readings: we will proceed with a constellation of readings whenever possible. Thus, in a consideration of series/seriality we might read together Robin Blaser's "ImageNation" poems, Robert Duncan's "Passages" poems, and Nathaniel Mackey's "Song of the Andoumboulou". In considering sequence, we will read in conjunction, Gertrude Stein's Stanza in Meditation and Lyn Hejinian's Oxota. William Carlos Williams' Paterson and Charles Olson's The Maximus Poems suggest another productive paired reading. Another useful paired reading might be the work of George Oppen (with emphasis on "Of Being Numerous") and Lorine Niedecker. In thinking about "accretion" or "life works", we will read from Zukofsky's A and from across Larry Eigner's body of work. Muriel Rukeyser's U.S. 1 and Charles Reznikoff's Testimony (along with Theresa Hak Kyung Cha's Dictee, possibly) will allow us to explore citational practice in twentieth century exploratory long poems. Other possible poets/texts: Susan Howe, Pythagorean Silence, Joan Retallack, Beverly Dahlen, A Reading. In correlation and extension: Georgio Agamben, from Infancy and History, Henri Bergson's work on "duration", Johannes Fabian, from Time and the Other, Maurice Blanchot, The Writing of the Disaster, Trinh Min ha, from When the Moon Waxes Red, among others, and certainly, examples of critical writing, essays on poetics, and so on, from the poets under study as well as secondary criticism on their work. This list is not meant to be definitive, but rather, indicative of the concerns of the seminar.

Basic requirements: weekly responses, one seminar presentation (15 20 minutes), and a final seminar project.
 

ENG 552 – BIBLE AS LITERATURE

          Prof. Diane Christian

          Wednesday 3:30- 6:10, Clemens 610

          Registration Numbers:  (A)  195946  (B) 034259

 

          Isaac Bashevis Singer remarked that to consider the Bible as literature is to profane the text and he reflects the sincere religious position of many.  Robert Graves said succinctly that “mythology is somebody else’s religion.”  This course considers the Bible under the rubric of mythology and literature to avoid the obvious interesting battle by occupying a space of fictional freedom.  But a central issue will be the idea of the Bible—a normative specific text on which we swear in court, a contentious complex history, and a sword.  We’ll read almost all the books of the Hebrew and Christian Testaments, with special attention to Genesis and Darwin, Exodus and Freud, the prophets and the Gospels and sacrifice theory, the Apocalypse and time.  We’ll survey some of the exegetical history that structures language theory, and some major interpretive strategies—religion, anthropology, psychoanalysis, feminism.

         

          While the primary goal will be to read the Biblical texts, a secondary one will be to explore some of the great dialogues with those texts—from the rabbis and church fathers to Voltaire and the poets and scientists.

 

 

ENG 578 – Readings in the Cultural History of Science and Medicine

 

          Prof. James J. Bono

          Wednesday l:00-3:40, Park 532

          Registration Number: 228582

 

          This seminar will provide an intensive introduction to major historiographical issues and approaches in recent scholarly work on the history of science and medicine and in recent attempts to write cultural histories of specific facets of science and medicine.  The course is intended to serve the needs of a broad range of students from history and from disciplines such as anthropology and literature, who have an interest in science, medicine, technical knowledge and practices, the body, sexuality, or related topics and their relationship to culture and society.  Through specific assignments, reports, and a term paper attempts will be made to shape the course to the needs of individual students, both those specializing in the history of science or medicine and those whose major interests are in other aspects of history or in other disciplines.  Intensive and extensive readings on a variety of periods and places (chiefly, but not exclusively, focused upon Europe and America) from antiquity to the twentieth century will form the core of this course.  The course will proceed through brief lectures and intensive discussion of readings and reports.

 

                   This semester (Spring 2005) we shall focus chiefly upon the cultural history of medicine, with special attention given to the history of the body and sexuality from antiquity to postmodern cyberculture.  We’ll address such topics as the body in ancient Greek and Chinese medical traditions; medicine, natural philosophy, and notions of sexual difference in ancient, medieval, and Renaissance Europe; the female body, the saintly body, and the criminal body in late medieval, Renaissance, and early modern Europe; monsters, marvels, and monstrous bodies from the 13th through the 18th centuries; the new cultural history of Renaissance anatomy; women, gender, the birth of modern political economy, and 17th and 18th century science and medicine; race, gender, and racialized bodies in European and American scientific and medical discourses; hermaphrodites and the scientific study of sexuality from the late Renaissance to the 20th century in Europe and America; Foucault’s History of Sexuality; and virtual surgery, technoscientifically altered human bodies, informatics, and the “posthuman” body.

 

 

ENG 584 – THE POETICS OF THE PARALITERARY

          Prof. Stephen McCaffery

          Wednesday 12:30-3:10, Clemens 438

          Registration Numbers:  (A)   483730    (B)  277912

 

Poetry, subsumed within the literary in general, involves a tolerable deviance from linguistic norms, yet where does tolerance end and why are its parameters circumscribed?  The seminar explores this question and moves to formulate a zone that might be called the paraliterary, a zone whose textual inhabitants partake of literariness but are excluded from literary and poetic canons.  A poetics of the paraliterary will be seen to emerge out of, and alongside, a tradition of linquistic conjecture that Gregory Ulmer calls a “linguistic” of the singular and the heterological;” a tradition that sees the materiality, corporeality and intransitivity of language as the prime stuff that poetry is made of.  As such the course presents material that collectively argues against those content-oriented literary studies whose focus is ideological, representational, and political, and investigates instead trans-historical treatments of language as excess, alien, obsessive and remainder.  In so doing the course opens up numerous encounters with poetry from the “other side” of language including alien writing systems, fake languages, alphabetical conjectures, universal language schemes, sound, word creation, orthography, orality, gesture and mania.  The material covered includes an extensive ethnic and trans-historic breadth: from Plato’s Cratyllus, Arabic Mystical alphabets, Cherokee alphabets, Easter Island Scripts and Harlem Jive, to the modernist provocations of Mallarmé, Gertrude Stein, James Joyce and Marcel Duchamp.  A special part of this course will examine the historical and cultural attitudes to the deaf, the related field of prosthetic, non-vocal systems of language, and provocations toward a gestural poetics.

 

 

 

ENG 585 – ASIAN AMERICAN WOMEN AUTOBIOGRAPHY

          Prof. Susan Moynihan

          Monday 12:30-3:10, Clemens 412

          Registration Numbers:  (A)  135579  (B) 481727

 

In the opening chapter of Compositional Subjects:  Enfiguring Asian/American Women, Laura Hyun Yi Kang focuses on the various deployments of Maxine Hong Kingston’s text The Woman Warrior to illustrate how the name “Maxine Hong Kingston” marks a point of autobiographical fixation and therefore becomes the object of various desires for knowledge.  She traces the positioning of The Woman Warrior in relation to American autobiography, women’s autobiography, and ethnic autobiography as ethnography, and finds that the proper name, “Maxine Hong Kingston,” is deployed to unfix or trouble some categorical markers (such as genre, gender, race, or culture) even while other categorical markers remain unquestionably fixed.  Kang concludes, “I would venture that the ‘debate’ over The Woman Warrior is symptomatic of the problem of delineating what counts as ‘Asian American literature,’ how ‘Asian American literature’ always fails to stand for ‘Asian Americans’” (67).

 

This course addresses Asian American women’s subjectivities as constructed through autobiographical texts in order to explore the paradoxes of identity and reference due to racialized and gendered constructions, particularly how such paradoxes affect the status of historical knowledge in the texts.  We will ask, what are the historical effects produced through autobiographical texts if the site is subjective, identity is unstable, and reference is problematized?  How are desires for knowledge shaped by power and the politics of difference?  Central to our discussions will be the politics of silence, betrayal, and diasporic affiliations for Asian American women; the racist constructions of Asians and Asian Americans as inscrutable surfaces; the feminization of the Orient; the politics of trauma and the contradictions of resistance and complicity; and the penetrating gaze of the consumer of autobiography.

 

Primary texts most likely will include the following:  Meena Alexander’s Fault Lines, Theresa Hak Kyung Cha’s, Dictee, Winnifred Eaton’s Me:  A Book of Remembrance, Sui Sin Far’s “Leaves from the Mental Portfolio of a Eurasian,” Le Ly Hayslip’s When Heaven and Earth Changed Places, Chanrithy Him’s When Broken Glass Floats, Maxine Hong Kingston’s The Woman Warrior, Mary Paik Lee’s Quiet Odyssey, Shirley Geok-lin Lim’s Among the White Moon Faces, Anchee Min’s Red Azalea, and Jeanne Wakatsuki Houston’s Farewell to Manzanar.

 

Course requirements include active participation in weekly discussions, one class presentation of a 7-8 page critical response to an assigned week’s readings, and a 15-20 page seminar paper.

 

 

ENG 587 – THE COMIC AESTHETIC

          Prof. Andrew Stott

          Wednesday 12:30-3:10, Clemens 436

          Registration Numbers: (A) 012526   (B)  228593

 

          In the modern academy, the invitation to embark upon an extended discussion of comedy and comic narratives has been largely ignored, with the implication that a study of the merely humorous is beneath the gravity of scholarship.  There are exceptions of course: the work of comic writers such as Aristophanes and Shakespeare receives enormous critical attention, yet, on reflection, it is apparent that much of it aims to demonstrate how in the final analysis their comedy is ‘really’ very serious indeed.  On this course we will avoid trying to make comedy always an allegory for something sober, trying instead to keep the ludic, the risible, the ridiculous, and the inverted at the very heart of our thought.

 

          The course will have three distinct strands.  First, it will introduce students to the history, theory, and terminology of Western comedy by means of a necessarily reductive survey of film and literature that begins in ancient Greece and ends in Hollywood, taking in comedies of humours, manners, wit, slapstick and existential angst.  Second, it will consider various methodological explanations of comedy, beginning with Aristotle’s Poetics and the anonymous Tractatus Coisilinianus, that moves on through the medieval and renaissance coupling of comedy to rhetoric, the Restoration ‘Collier Debate’, and, more recently, Mikhail Bakhtin’s theory of carnival, Freud’s theory of jokes, Henry Bergson’s concept of the élan vital, Northrop Frye’s structural-seasonal ideas of genre.  The third, and most speculative, part of the course, will consist of trying to conceive of comedy as a type of critical theory—the risible or ridiculous as a means of interrogating ideas in philosophy or culture.  For this we will consider comic subjectivities as they are found in comic techniques such as travesty and cross-dressing, or in the guise of trickster figures and fools, and read selections from Erasmus, Nietzsche, Baudelaire, Derrida, de Man, Jean-Luc Nancy and others.

 

          Seminar participants will be required to engage in discussions and full and frank debate, deliver at least two or three presentations during the course of the semester and submit a full-length research paper on a topic agreed with me.  GSOH essential.

 

ENG 593 – STUDIES IN GENRE:

                             MULTICULTURAL AUTOBIOGRAPHY

 

          Prof. Robert Newman

          Thursday 4:00-6:40, Clemens 412

          Registration Number: 414931

 

Multicultural autobiography has both a theoretical aim--to examine the costs and benefits of a pluralistic or multicultural approach to autobiography--and a practical aim, to encourage the writing of family history from a wide variety of personal and intellectual viewpoints.

 

Aside from Classic American Autobiographies, which includes Franklin (the still-essential American according to Gordon Wood). Douglass, Twain, and Zitkala-Sa, I’ll choose from among the following full-length autobiographical texts:

 

Torgovnick’s Crossing Ocean Parkway (the signature essay is “On Being White, Female and Born in Bensonhurst), Nafisi’s Reading Lolita in Tehran (teaching Nabokov, Fitzgerald and James under the eyes of the Iranian mullahs), Manji’s What’s Wrong with Islam (an intellectual autobiography beginning with her rebellious childhood experiences in a madressa in Vancouver), Ahmed’s A Border Passage (Egyptian-born but  an eventual  feminist scholar who blooms in America, now a chaired professor at Harvard Divinity School), Ansary’s West of Kabul, East of New York (discovering a journalistic career in the land of the pre-Taliban, with a post-Taliban anti-invasion plea), Rodriguez’s  Hunger of Memory (gay, Catholic, anti-bilingual , accused of slighting his middle class-dom), McBride’s Color of Water (two alternating stories—his Jewish mother’s and black father’s  in italics, his own story in  roman font--a search for the truth of his mother’s racial and religious identity), Sacks’ How the Jews Became White Folks (personal stories plus astute history and sociology), Monette’s gay autobiography Becoming a Man, Alexie’s  “Smoke Signals” (a sweet-tough movie about reservation life),  Kingston’s Ghost Warriors (Chinese-American and she says she would have written it a bit differently nowadays), Mike Rose’s Lives on the Boundary (growing up poor, white, Italian and cast as an developmental idiot, Rose is befriended by teachers who show him how to read Burtt’s Metaphysical Foundations of Modern Science –Rose eventually ends up teaching  developmental English at UCLA), Grealy’s Story of a Face (disability autobiography, now  complemented—perhaps— by Grealy’s friend Patchett in her own near-critique autobio)….

 

These are some of the books I’ve used in the past and will use again. As a group these texts certainly exhibit a multicultural aim but in some cases they also reflect

 

dissatisfaction with crucial aspects of  the multicultural idea, notably that as identity itself is in question, all groups and societies are absolutely equal and hence beyond criticism. I will also assemble a number of theoretical  essays on the development of American pluralism, multiculturalism and ethnicity (e.g. Anthony Appiah (here for lectures this fall 05) on “the multicultural mistake.”

 

Requirements include spot researches on particular issues and critical essays and either a critical, researched essay on family or group background or an autobiographical essay on your own family history.

 

 

ENG 594 – JEWISH WRITERS IN AMERICA, Part 2

 

          Prof. Mark Shechner

          Tuesday 7:00-9:40, Clemens 436

          Registration Number:  034566

 

          This course picks up where the Fall 2003 course left off, with the explosion of Jewish fictions writing in the main stream of American fiction after the Second World War.  Everyone is familiar with the names of Saul Bellow, Bernard Malamud, and Philip Roth, but how many know the writing of Isaac Rosenfeld, Lionel Trilling (indeed he wrote a novel), Leslie Fiedler, Meyer Levin, Meyer Liben, etc.  We might toward the end leap into the very contemporary with writing by, say, Cynthia Ozick, Michael Chabon (a great nephew of Abraham Cahan), Melvin Jules Bukiet, Steve Stern, or Nathan Englander.  We will also look at social and intellectual developments along the way, in journals such as Partisan Review and Commentary and various offshoots and antecedents.  It will also be, as was the Fall 2003 semester, a course in social history, the life and pressures and values that the literature arose out of.

 

 

ENG 595 – ADVANCED NON-FICTION PROSE

          Prof. Mark Shechner

          Tuesday 7:00-9:40, Clemens 436

          Registration Number:  352709

 

          This course, which is dual-listed for students at both the senior level and graduate MA-level, is designed to get students beyond the basic routines of composition and the jargons and codes of “lit-crit” in their writing.  Thus it is ideal for students who envision journalism as a career or as an active supplement to an academic career.  It takes “composition” and your capacity for clarity and organization for granted and moves on to the next step: being interested.

 

          The course will permit you to think about and work on matters of voice and style.  A writer of any kind who wishes to make headway with his/her writing must have a voice, a distinctive signature that is his or hers alone.  You’ll spend a lot of time learning how not to sound like a generic, Brand X clone of some other unfortunate Brand X clone.  (Voice is defined in a novel by Philip Roth as “something that starts from down behind your knees and ends up above your head.”  True, but you still have to work at it.)  We’ll spend a lot of time on resource building: where do words come from?  Where do phrases come from?  What is a sentence rhythm and how can I develop it?  How do arguments really work?  How many drafts of an essay or review do I have to write before it is any good?  (I’d say ten if it is not important, twenty if it really matters.)

 

          I’ll ask every student to find and adopt a master stylist and apprentice him/herself to that master.  Apprenticeship and a degree of mimicry are key to writing well.  Your own voice begins in the shadow of another’s voice.

 

          Among the many requirements of good writing is to really know something, know it down to its depths, and each student will work on a semester-long project that would be potentially, maybe even actually, publishable at the end of the semester.

         

          Since the class will be writing and reading-intensive, I shall limit it to 22 students, ideally balanced between eleven undergraduates and eleven graduates, and a decision will be made at the end of the first week of class on the basis of a sample of writing you submit on the first day.  I’m looking for students who already can write and are serious about practicing and polishing that skill.

 

Requirements:

1.  A sample of earlier writing to be submitted on the first day of class.  Ideal length, 7-15 pages.

 

2. Regular attendance: Attendance is simply required, and I will take roll.  To get anything out of a course that meets just once a week you have to be in it, and students who are not in it should not expect to make up for lost class time through exams or papers.  In a course that meets once a week, students who miss more than two classes for any reason will suffer an automatic lower of grade.

 

3. Two books: a thesaurus and a portable dictionary.  They are indispensable tools, and I’ll have a number ordered for the course through Talking Leaves Book Store at 3158 Main Street.

 

 

ENG 607 – STUDIES IN RENAISSANCE: Drana/Media/Culture

          Prof. Jim Swan

          Monday 12:30-3:10, Clemens 538

          Registration Numbers:  (A)  300014  (B) 436879

 

            An inquiry into the relation between English Renaissance stage practice and modern (20th/21st century) media, political & cultural theory. In what ways have film and TV shaped our perception of Shakespeare and his contemporaries? What is the effect of translating their intensely verbal stage medium into today’s visual media? For instance, look at Julie Taymor’s fascinating adaptation of Titus Andronicus (Titus, 1999): the moment in Act 2, Scene 3, lines 192-245 when Martius falls into the pit and finds Bassianus’s body. Film directors inevitably cut lines, and Taymor cuts more than half of the passage, translating it into visual terms. The first meeting of the seminar will consider this scene, with Taymor’s film version, in order to develop questions about Renaissance drama in relation to our 21st century experience of textual, theatrical, and cinematic media. During the semester we will be reading from recent studies of Shakespeare, theater and film.

 

            Another series of questions will be concerned with the Renaissance representation of a public, political culture, chiefly on the stage, and how that relates to the American, TV-saturated representation of today’s public sphere and political process. Consider, for instance, George W. Bush’s projection of personal sincerity and conviction, the oft televised phrase, “In my heart I believe . . .” accompanied by a hand on his chest. In what way does this have public or political meaning? To what extent do our media substitute the private and “personal” for the public and political? To get a handle on such questions, we will read selections from Hannah Arendt and Jürgen Habermas, and from recent criticism of their work, linking their analysis of private and public spheres to our reading of Renaissance plays.

 

            Likely dramatic texts include: Shakespeare, Titus Andronicus, Twelfth Night, 1 Henry IV, Much Ado, Hamlet, Macbeth; Dekker, Shoemaker’s Holiday; Jonson, Bartholomew Fair; Beaumont, Knight of the Burning Pestle.

 

 

ENG 609 – 19TH CENTURY AMERICAN LITERATURE & LITERARY THEROY

          Prof. Kenneth Dauber

          Wed. 12:30, Clemens 412

          Registration Numbers: (A) 041247  (B) 436744

 

          Our purpose will be to provide a map of the terrain of classic American literature and the various contested approaches to it.  Each week we will read two books, a modern work of literary criticism and an underlying text from the nineteenth century that is especially important for that criticism.  So, for example, one week we may read some of the major slave narratives (Douglas, Jacobs) side by side with Louis Henry Gates’s construction of African-American literature in The Signifying Monkey.  Another week we will read, say, Uncle Tom’s Cabin along with Jane Tompkins’s Sensational Designs, on women’s literature in general.  And so on: D.H. Lawrence and Benjamin Franklin, Stanley Cavell and Emerson, Gillian Brown and Melville, or etc.  The secondary works will be a mix of enduring conceptions, fugitive fashion, and personal preference, some older and some newer, but all of which, in their variety, offer pathways through the field.  We will take up feminism, cultural studies, ordinary language criticism, deconstruction, new historicism, and on.  By the end of the course you should have a very good idea of the uses—helpful, problematical, wonderful, absurd—to which some of the major contemporary critical isms have been put in serious practice so that you can begin to formulate where and how you stand or maybe, even, challenge where you may be standing already.

 

 

ENG 628 – 20TH CENTURY AMERICAN LITERATURE

          Prof. Neil Schmitz

          Tuesday 3:30-6:10, Clemens 436

          Registration Numbers: (A) 232953  (B)  194627

 

          We will read Ernest Hemingway’s The Sun Also Rises, F. Scott Fitzgerald’s The Great Gatsby, Gertrude Stein’s Tender Buttons, and William Faulkner’s As I Lay Dying.  We will start with Donald Barthelme’s “at the Tolstoy Museum” in City Life.  It begins: “At the Tolstoy Museum we sat and wept.”  It is our prefatory text.  We can’t do the entire Hemingway, Fitzgerald, Stein, Faulkner museums, so we will visit rooms, read these single texts.  Next we enter these unfinished museums, not opened as such for us, but there, the structure in place, and if we have time we will do two texts each: Philip Roth’s Portnoy’s Complaint and Sabbath’s Theater, Cormac McCarthy’s Outer Dark and Suttree, Toni Morrison’s The Bluest Eye and Sula.  Cultural context, genre, mode, project, we consider these as we do close reading.

 

 

ENG 647 – POETICS OF THE AMERICAS

          Prof. Dennis Tedlock

          Tuesday 12:30-3:10, Clemens 540

          Registration Numbers: (A) 027578  (B) 138710

 

          This seminar will be guided, in part, by a strategic (or provisional) essentialism.  We will look and listen for poetry—whether past, ongoing, or projected—that is specific, in some radical sense, to the so-called Americas or New World or Western Hemisphere, or to Turtle Island.  In the case of poetries from the indigenous languages of these world, we will try for modes of interpretation and translation that neither locate them on the margins of Eurocentric poetics nor assign them to a prehistory of poetics.  In the case of poetries that belong to the new languages of these worlds, which is to say creoles and pidgins, we will again try to decenter Europe.

 

          Texts dealing with the first contacts between Europeans and the peoples who were new to them will be read for clues to poetic differences, with special attention to native accounts of the invaders.  We will also consider the radically indigenous writings of the Americas, including pictographs but with special attention to newly deciphered Mayan texts.  Mayan literature, written in what turns out to be a phonetic script, begins 500 years earlier than English literature.  Its re-emergence into readability, which comes at the same time as a major cultural renewal among Mayan peoples, poses major problems for Eurocentric cultural schemes (and for Olson’s human universe).

 

          One-page response papers will be due at each meeting, with a longer piece of work due at the end.  Alternatives to term papers may be negotiated, including translations, writerly works, performance pieces, etc.

 

          Readings will include a wide range of texts, translations, and interpretations by most of the following and others as well: Paula Gunn Allen, Mary Austin, Jorge Luis Borges, Edward Kamau Brathwaite, Daniel G. Brinton, Edouard Glissant, Dell Hymes, Ah Maxam, Alonzo Gonzales  , Charles Olson, Simon Ortiz, Andrew Peynetsa, Kenneth Rexroth, Jerome Rothenberg, Maria Sabina, Leslie Marmon Silko, Gary Snyder, Nathaniel Tarn, Cecilia Vicuña, Lady Xok, Ray Young Bear.  Listenings will cover a wide range of performances in various languages, some of which will be made available on the course web site.

 

 

ENG 648 – THE CRITICAL AND THE CLINICAL

          Prof. Steven Miller

          Wednesday 7:00-9:40, Clemens 436

          Registration Numbers: (A) 309626   (B) 448191

 

          This seminar borrows its title from a book by Gilles Deleuze (Critique et clinique) in order to pose anew questions about the relation between psychoanalysis and critical theory.  For political reasons relating to the hegemony of brain science over the field of psychological research, Freudian psychoanalysis has in recent times been studied primarily in those departments of the university where the critical project—the project upon which the institution of the modern university itself was founded—remains an urgent task.  However, the work done in such quarters has primarily upheld psychoanalysis as the analysis of culture, rather than as technique, or clinic.  Although a series of recent publications, such as Bruce Fink’s A Clinical Introduction to Lacanian Psychoanalysis, or Joël Dor’s The Clinical Lacan, represent laudable attempts to remedy this historical oversight, one begins to sense that the question of “theory and technique” has been ill posed.  The seminar will therefore seek to elucidate the question of the relation between the critical and the clinical, starting from the assumption that  the clinic is not simply the special domain of “clinicians,” but is somehow essential to grasping the specific critical project of psychoanalysis.  Lacan suggested as much when he insisted, not only that the unconscious is structured like a language, but also that this language is an encrypted address to the analyst, and then formalized the link between structure and address in the “discourse of the analyst.”  We will explore two main approaches to the question.  First, we will try to discover whether psychoanalytic technique itself implies a critical project.  To this end we will read selections from Freud’s Studies on Hysteria, Papers on technique, Three Essays on the Theory of Sexuality, The Interpretation of Dreams, Lacan’s first seminar, and his écrits on “treatment,” in addition to some works of Sándor Ferenczi, such as his “clinical diary.”  Then we will examine Lacan’s engagement with Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason.  Secondly, in addition to reading Foucault’s Birth of the Clinic, we will discuss the work of several philosophers (Nietzsche, Rosenzweig, Deleuze, Derrida) whose engagement with the philosophical tradition turns upon a thinking of the clinic.

 

 

ENG 680 – 19TH CENTURY AFRICAN AMERICAN WRITERS

                                      Harlem Renaissance Writings

 

          Prof. Nathan Grant

          Thursday 3:30 – 6:10, Clemens 538

            Registration Numbers: (A)  366409  (B) 345084

 

            Despite his compelling sixteenth chapter on the reasons for the day-to-day despair of black Philadelphians in The Philadelphia Negro (1899), W.E.B. Du Bois seems to sidestep the fact that those very pressures also generate anger, cynicism and a taste for dangerous entertainments. But this very bifurcation of thought represents the ordinary (and myriad) ambiguities and ambivalences about black selfhood that themselves become the curiously open-ended period known as the Harlem Renaissance, the heart of which found perhaps its fullest expression in the decade and a half beginning 1920.  The New Negro, the metaphor for black defiance and subjectivity between the wars, has slippages that we encounter in its cultural transvaluations, many more than are captured by Nathan Huggins’ assertion in his Harlem Renaissance (1971) that “the very presence of a New Negro determines a dissatisfaction with the Old.” 

 

Overall, the course will seek to contest that the familiar themes of race, class and gender are implicated in appreciations of the black body and of sexuality and culture, are unbound from soon-to-be ossified Victorian conventions and compose the vehicle on which elements of both the black masculine and feminine themselves are insurgent in the debates on pluralism and modernist expression prevalent during the period. 

 

Primary texts include: Jean Toomer, Cane; Claude McKay, Home to Harlem; Nella Larsen, Quicksand and Passing; Carl Van Vechten, Nigger Heaven; Jessie Fauset, There Is Confusion. 

 

Secondary authors include: Lauren Berlant, Hortense Spillers, Henry Louis Gates, Jr., Joy James, George Hutchinson, Ann Douglas. 

 

 

 

ENG 681 – WOMEN’S EXPERIMENTAL FICTION

          Prof. Christina Milletti

          Monday 3:30-6:10, Clemens 538

          Registration Numbers: (A) 255201  (B) 260184

 

          It might be said that criticism of women’s experimental fiction arises from two distinct positions—one the one hand, it sets itself against the belief that women’s writing is fundamentally realist and experiential (that women’s interests are focused on representation not innovation), and, on the other hand, it moves towards an understanding of narrative experimentation by women as inherently feminist gesture.  As Ellen Friedman notes, “By exploding dominant forms, women experimental writers not only assail the social structure, but also produce an alternate fictional space, a space in which the feminine, marginalized in traditional fiction and patriarchal culture, can be expressed.”  This course will challenge both these positions by asking what makes innovative fictions by women in particular, distinctive within the field of experimental fiction in general.  Virginia Woolf reminds us that experimental narratives by women “[break] the sentence…[break] the sequence”—that they rupture conventional expectations of women’s writing.  Over the course of this semester, then, we will consider the various techniques that women innovative writers use to critique the constraints that limit both gender and conventional forms of fiction alike.  We will evaluate what kind of “scene” these innovative women represent when put into critical proximity.  Above all, we will investigate the techniques that writers as diverse as Gertrude Stein, Djuina Barnes, Christine Brooke-Rose, Kathy Acker, and Shelley Jackson (among several others) use to

examine the relationship of language to power in order to

elaborate an understanding of gender.

 

 

This seminar is designed as a hybrid course:

students will be required to write critical as well as creative projects.

 

 

ENG 690 – LATINA/O CULTURAL THEORY

          Prof. Carrie Tirado Bramen

          Monday 3:30-6:10, Clemens 436

          Registration Numbers:  (A)  268717  (B) 430088

         

          The objective of this course is to explore the cultural theories and debates in the field of Latina/o studies beginning with Jose Martí’sNuestra America” (1891) and continuing to contemporary discussions of latinidad and other hemipheric identities such as “Americanicity.”  What is at stake in moving from the particular (i.e. Chicano, Nuyorican) to the general (Latino), from nationalist configurations of identity to hemipheric ones? We will examine a variety of genres (ie. performance art, testimonios) and the influence of queer theory in conceptualizing the borderlands and subcultural identification (Muñoz’sdisidentifications”). In addition, we will look at recent scholarship on the Americas as an inter-racial contact zone between Latinos, Asians, Native Americans and Afro-hispanos, African Americans. Finally, we will familiarize ourselves with some of the key cultural debates in Latin America ranging from theories of (under)development to concerns about political and cultural sovereignty (the Caliban question). Where Latin American intellectuals have been concerned with the limits of cultural borrowing--how to appropriate debates from the metropolis without imitating them in the periphery--this course will attempt to reverse this process of what Fernando Ortiz calls “transculturation,” by asking how Latin American cultural debates can inform discussions about U.S. Latina/o cultural production.

 

This is a partial list of the readings:

Coco Fusco, English is Broken Here

Roberto Fernández Retamar, Caliban and Other Essays

Carlos Monsivais, Mexican Postcards

Gloria Anzaldúa, La Frontera/The Borderlands

Octavio Paz, The Labyrinth of Solitude

Sandra Cisneros, Woman Hollering Creek

Alma García, ed. Chicana Feminist Thought: The Basic Historical Writings

 

One-page reading notes (10), and a seminar paper.

 

 

ENG 693 – CONTEMPORARY NATIVE AMERICAN POETRY & POETICS

          Prof. Scott Manning Stevens

          Tuesday 3:30-6:20, Clemens 538

          Registration Numbers: (A)  085067  (B)  354858

 

This seminar will focus on developments in Native American poetry since the late 1960s.

 

The seminar will examine themes and issues specific to Native Americans writing in English and in their respective native languages.  Since all North American Native Peoples descend from non-literate oral societies, we will focus on the issues of traditional orality as well as the influence of Modernist Euro-American poetics.

 

This will mean that we will have to attend to culturally specific issues based on tribal affiliation, history, and region as well as, the issue of direct poetic and literary influences.  Carter Revard, an Osage poet, for instance, is a university professor specializing in Medieval English literature, while Maurice Kenny, a Mohawk poet, traces the primary influence on his writing to the poetry of Louise Bogan.  For each poet read in this seminar we will address issues of ethnic identity, acculturation, and poetic affiliation.

 

We will begin by examining some background materials, including recordings of oral poetics and traditional song.  After some consideration of critical works on ethno-poetics we will look at two late nineteenth-century Native American poets: E. Pauline Johnson and Alexander Lawrence Posey.  From within this context we will jump to the poetry of Leslie Marmon Silko and M. Scott Momaday in the late 1960s and move on to such contemporary poets as Simon Ortiz, Wendy Rose, Carter Revard, Joy Harjo, Maurice Kenny, Roberta Hill, Sherman Alexie, Laura Tohe, James Stevens and others.

Cross-listed with Indigenous Studies

 

 

ENG 697 – DEFINITIONS OF AMERICA

          Prof. Robert Daly

          Wednesday 3:30-6:10, Clemens 538

          Registration Numbers:  (A) 015745  (B) 062059

 

            We shall read, within their reciprocal cultural contexts, several writings that help to define, create, or revise our national cultures, both the discourse of nationalism and what Julia Kristeva calls the discourses of "nations without nationalism."  We shall attend to their interactions with other cultures, with conversations among them, and with the ways in which they are both representative (participating in the cultural conversations of their times and ours) and hermeneutic (affording practice and instruction in the arts of interpretation).  Ecocriticism, feminism, ecofeminism, trauma theory, rhetorical hermeneutics, literary anthropology, cultural criticism, post-analytic philosophy, virtue ethics, cultural theory, and any other theories we find useful will be welcome in our discussions of these texts but will not replace them.

 

            Each student will do one seminar report (15-20 minutes), and each student taking the seminar intensively (for full credit) will also do one research essay on a topic of his or her own choosing.

 

Texts:
William Andrews, ed., Classic American Autobiographies (Mentor, Penguin) [contains Rowlandson, Franklin, Douglass, and Zitkala-Sa] Susanna Haswell Rowson, Charlotte Temple: A Tale of Truth, ed. Cathy N. Davidson (Oxford)

Washington Irving, The Sketch Book of Geoffrey Crayon, Gent. (Signet)

James Fenimore Cooper, The Last of the Mohicans (Signet)Catharine Maria Sedgwick, Hope Leslie; or Early Times in the Massachusetts (Rutgers UP) Ralph Waldo Emerson, Emerson's Prose and Poetry, ed. Joel Porte and Saundra Morris (Norton Critical Edition)Margaret Fuller, Woman in the Nineteenth Century, ed. Larry J. Reynolds (Norton Critical Edition)

Nathaniel Hawthorne, The Blithedale Romance (Bedford)

Henry David Thoreau, Walden, 2d ed., ed. William Rossi (Norton Critical Edition)

Rebecca Harding Davis, Life in the Iron Mills (Bedford)

Henry James, The Turn of the Screw and Other Short Novels (Signet)

 

            Though you may, of course, acquire them anywhere you please, these texts will be available at Talking Leaves Bookstore.

  

ENG 697 - DEFINITIONS OF AMERICA

Prof. Bruce Jackson
Monday 3:30-6:10, 610 Clemens
Registration Number: 277592


The Great Depression was the third in a sequence of extended conditions in the first third of the 20th century, one of them brief, the other two lasting not much more than a decade each that radically altered the character of life in America. The first was our avoidance of and then involvement in the so-called Great War, which made us a global power. The second was Prohibition, in which for the first time ordinary American citizens sought continuing relationships with professional criminals. Third was the Great Depression and the awareness that the Dream and the Reality were not the same thing at all.

This was the decade in which the Archive of American Folklore was established, the first agency in Federal government to seek words and music of ordinary people, rather than documents generated by the rich and powerful or anthropological reports about curious Others. It was the decade in which the government intervened in the landscape as never before: Boulder Dam, Shasta Dam, Bonneville Dam on Oregon's Columbia River, the Lincoln Tunnel, the TVA, and the Pennsylvania Turnpike. It was a time when popular and folk heroes were John Dillinger, Pretty Boy Floyd, Bonnie Parker and Clyde Barrow, Al Capone, Mickey Mouse, Superman, Dick Tracy, Felix the Cat and the Lone Ranger. It was movies like Little Caesar, Scarface, Public Enemy, I am a Fugitive from a Chain Gang, the Petrified Forest, the Plow that Broke the Plains, Barbary Coast, It Happened One Night, Mr. Smith Goes to Washington, 42nd Street, Stagecoach, and Grapes of Wrath. It was the Scottsboro Boys, the Bonus Marchers, Woody Guthrie, Life and Time, Busby Berkeley, Clifford Odets, Social Security, and FDR's mantra: "We have nothing to fear but fear itself." It was a decade in which notions of gender roles, class and race that had previously seemed natural and obvious seemed ever more conditional and contrived.

In this seminar, we'll discuss some of those books, events, films, heroes, events, and institutions, and songs. We'll look at the government's attempt to redefine America, particularly in the four component parts of the WPA's Federal One: The Federal Theater, Writers', Arts, and Music Projects. (What did the government want from those projects and what did it get from people like Jack Conroy, Conrad Aiken, Richard Wright, Ralph Ellison, Walker Evans, Dorothea Lange, Saul Bellow, Jackson Pollock, William De Kooning, Orson Welles, Arthur Miller, and John Huston?) And we'll work our way to what I think is the book masterpiece of the period: Let Us Now Praise Famous Men, the astonishing collaboration between writer James Agee and photographer Walker Evans, the significance of which would not become apparent for another twenty years.

Some of the readings (tentative, I will probably alter this):
Jerre Mangione. The Dream and the Deal: The Federal Writers' Project, 1935-1943
Robert S. McElvaine. The Great Depression: America, 1929-1943
Andrew Bergman. We're in the Money: Depression American and its Films
Michael Denning. The Cultural Front: The Laboring of American Culture in the Twentieth Century
Charlotte Nekola and Paula Rabinowitz, eds. Writing Red: An Anthology of American Women Writers, 1920-1940
Zora Neale Hurston. Mules and Men
Jack Conroy. The Disinherited
Henry Roth. Call It Sleep
John Steinbeck. The Grapes of Wrath
Richard Wright. Native Son


~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~